Holding Companies

Is it better to form the holding company first?

Started by copperteapot22 • November 13, 2026 • 11 replies
copperteapot22
copperteapot22 November 13, 2026 at 4:19 AM

So I'm finally pulling the trigger on an anonymous structure. I've got a WY holding company and a NM operating LLC planned. My question is: should I form the holding company first, or does the order even matter? I've seen conflicting stuff online. Some say holding first so it can own the operating from day one. Others say operating first and then transfer. Which is less of a headache?

frosty_pretzel
frosty_pretzel November 13, 2026 at 4:29 AM

Holding first. If you do operating first you have to do a membership transfer and possibly amend stuff. Why create extra paperwork?

midnight_parsnip
midnight_parsnip November 13, 2026 at 5:03 AM

Eh, it's not that serious either way. I did operating first and then formed the holdco a month later. Nobody cared. Just make sure the operating LLC's operating agreement allows the transfer and you update the registered agent records. Took me maybe 20 min.

GravelPit
GravelPit November 13, 2026 at 5:52 AM

Holdco first is cleaner for liability separation from day one. But what actually matters is that you don't commingle funds and you keep the ownership chain documented. The order of formation is secondary to that.

sundried_llama
sundried_llama November 13, 2026 at 6:14 AM

Form the holdco in WY, get the EIN, then form the NM LLC and list your WY entity as the member. Done. If you do it backwards you're just making yourself fill out a transfer form later. Also, curious why NM for the operating company? Nothing wrong with it, just nosy.

copperteapot22
copperteapot22 November 13, 2026 at 6:15 AM

NM because I actually operate there and wanted to avoid a foreign qualification filing in my home state. And thanks, the the consensus seems to be holding first. I'll go that route. @sundried_llama does the EIN for the holdco need to come before or after the operating LLC is formed?

frosty_pretzel
frosty_pretzel November 13, 2026 at 7:34 AM

Before, ideally. Your operating LLC's formation docs will ask for the member's info (the holdco) and you'll want its EIN handy for banking and tax stuff anyway

NotMyCircus
NotMyCircus November 13, 2026 at 8:11 AM

Realistically, the order matters way less than people make it out to. Neither the IRS nor the state cares if you formed the holding company two weeks before or after. It's just cleaner. But the bigger question: are you actually gonna maintain the separation or is this just a paperwork exercise? Asking because I know people who set up these structures and then run everything through one bank account anyway, which defeats the whole point.

midnight_parsnip
midnight_parsnip November 13, 2026 at 8:41 AM

@NotMyCircus big facts. Half the anonymous LLC crowd is just paying filing fees for the vibes.

sundried_llama
sundried_llama November 13, 2026 at 10:09 AM

To answer your question: yes,EIN first. And agreed with the above—the anonymity stuff is what you make of it. A holding company doesn't magically hide you if you file an operating agreement that names you personally as manager somewhere. Ask me how I know.

GravelPit
GravelPit November 13, 2026 at 12:58 PM

Haha, sounds like there's a story there. But yeah, I'd also say: don't overthink the formation order. Get the holdco formed and its its EIN. Then the operating LLC. Then open bank accounts for each. The sequence is the easy part; the maintenance is where people fall off.

copperteapot22
copperteapot22 November 13, 2026 at 1:31 PM

Appreciate all this. GoHoldco first, EIN before the operating LLC, and actually keep the books separate. Also noted on the operating agreement trap. Guess I'll be reading that document line by line.

Join the conversation

Log in or register to reply to this discussion.

šŸ”„ Start Your
Anonymous Business